News & Resources

IRAP v. Trump: Challenging the Trump administration Executive Orders banning entry of nationals from certain Muslim-majority countries

IRAP is the named plaintiff in IRAP v. Trump, the first lawsuit to challenge both President Trump’s original and revised Executive Orders in their entirety. The complaint states that the order discriminates against Muslims because of their religion and is thus unconstitutional. The lawsuit was filed by IRAP, HIAS, the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), and individual plaintiffs. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) are acting as co-counsel.

On June 26, 2017, the United States Supreme Court decided to review the case, however, canceled October oral arguments after the President signed a new Proclamation on September 24 which restricted travel from eight, majority Muslim, countries. On October 17, Hawaii Federal Judge Derrick Watson granted motion for a temporary restraining order, which blocked the newest Proclamation from taking effect. After subsequent oral arguments at the Maryland District Court, in response to an amended complaint filed by IRAP, the ACLU, and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), Judge Theodore Chuang ruled in favor of a partial preliminary injunction, providing relief to thousands who would’ve been affected by these sweeping, discriminatory travel restrictions. On February 15, 2018, the Fourth Circuit en banc affirmed the injunction.

However, on June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawai’i, which also challenged the new Proclamation, allowed the Proclamation to take effect and found that plaintiffs are not entitled to preliminary relief. Following that decision, IRAP v. Trump was remanded to the district court. The district court found that the case should proceed to discovery and the government has appealed that decision.

Follow the Case

  • Press Release: IRAP Statement on Court Decision to End Muslim Ban Challenge

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: Groups File for En Banc Review of Muslim Ban Challenge, Vow to Keep Fighting

    View Press Release +
  • Federal Court Rules Muslim Ban Challenge Can Continue

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: IRAP Statement on Today’s Supreme Court Decision

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: IRAP Statement on the Supreme Court Hearing in Trump v. Hawaii

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: IRAP Welcomes Court Ruling Affirming Injunction of the Muslim Ban

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: IRAP Disappointed by SCOTUS Decision to Let Muslim Ban Go Into Full Effect

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: As Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Muslim Ban Case, IRAP Vows to Continue Fighting

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: IRAP Praises 4th Circuit Ruling Affirming Suspension of Muslim Ban

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: Suing Groups Respond to Trump Administration Appeal of Maryland Block on Muslim Ban

    View Press Release +
  • Press Release: IRAP Vows to Continue Fighting Unconstitutional Travel Ban

    View Press Release +